My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad

« Simian Substitute Site for March 2007: Drunken Monkey Motorcycle | Main | BFI Southbank »


Suze (accept no imposters)

Well of course I have to reply to this, and is it really ten years since it started ! (seems that the older you get the younger the recruitment age for policemen, and the faster the time goes). So does Buffy really stand the test of time ? Hmmm !

I am not a great fan of American television per se, however for me there have been five great US shows over the last decade: FRIENDS, FRASIER, STAR TREK - NEXT GENERATION (include in this VOYAGER, but not ds9 or enterprise), ALLY MCBEAL, and BUFFY. Now all of these were essential television when they first came out, and I still enjoy catching the occasional episode of Friends and Fraser as they are currently repeated on E4 and C4. However I don't know what it is about the other three, but for me they very much suffer from what I call 'Live TV Sport Syndrome'; namely hugely exciting to watch at the time, but not something one could ever contemplate sitting through for a repeat viewing. Obviously you feel different.

I will come to the criticisms in a moment, but lets deal with the hot totty bit of the show first, which I know is why you and me (Spank) really watched it. I have to admit Miss Buffy Geller never really did it for me (but yes I did like her mum though). Also Ms Callender (killed off far too early) was a bit of alright, and someone old enough to fancy with a clear conscience. However for me the most disturbing part of the show was not all the demons and vampires, but instead how much I had the hots for young Willow (Hannigan). Not being a fan of the AMERICAN (........) film series type of comedy, I have always hoped she would pop up in something else, so I could tell myself 'look it's alright she is really a grown up'. Yet the only time she did, it was by surprise on TV in a repeat viewing of My Stepmother Is An Alien (made when she was 14). AAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRGGH where's my psychiatrist ?

Cordelia was a great character, and one of my biggest criticisms of ANGEL, was the total personality shift she was given by the writers of that series. A classic Cordelia line was when an indignant Xander tells her that he has been watching Buffy's back for years. To which Cordelia replies: "You mean you have been watching Buffy's Butt for years". Another great line was when Evil Willow was trying to convince her she was Normal Willow, by saying 'I'm so weak and helpless'.To which Cordy replies: "Oh yes the I'm so weak and helpless act, that all the boys seem to go for" (sightly paraphrased but you get the idea)

So alright enough of the good times, it;s time to stick the boot in. So to start all of the Buffy romance threads whether with Angel, that army type bloke (initiative was it ?) and finally with Spike, were for me nothing more than a dreary distraction, which thankfully the shows didn't hang on, otherwise they would have been unwatchable. Also it seems the longer the series/s went on the duller it became, probably starting with that whole Initiative thing (and the stupid series long robot monster) which was turgid in the extreme.

This also began to coincide with two major shifts in Willows character, which suggested new writers on board trying to impose their own mark. Now if you had told me that Willow would stop seeing werewolf boy, and instead would become a lesbian well...... (well by rights it should have been double sessions for me with the psychiatrist). In the event it was completely boring and unbelievable, which if I happened to be a real life lesbian (work with me on this) would no doubt have had me spitting blood along with the curly hairs. The other real stinker was this whole thing of Willow becoming a Super Power type witch ? (wow they must have had a bitching library at Sunnydale High). This being the final nail in what was the best character in the series.

What else (this is probably me not paying attention), oh yes 'every once in a generation there comes a chosen one to be a slayer'. Okay, so how did that explain Faith ? Then there is evil Spike suddenly becoming good spike (can nothing be relied upon). In fact what nearly stopped me viewing altogether and with immediate effect, was the moment Buffys mum said to Miss Geller as she was about to go shopping "don't forget to take your sister". Ironically however the whole Dawn/Key thing, was the one latter plot twist that appeared to have been thought through, rather than tacked on, and breathed a final bit of life into an otherwise dying series.

Now I don't know did I read this somewhere, or was it my take on the thing, but that the Buffy series was really a metaphor for the real life dangers of being of student age in present day America. Surrounded as they are by gangs, drug dealers, and psychotic killers. After all in Buffy armed guards don't patrol the school corridors, that only happens in real life. However this leads in to my MAJOR CRITICISM of the show (which surprisingly I never picked up on at the time - blame Willow), namely the inherent Racism in it. Joss Whedon is that an anagram for Aaron Spelling (you work it out). Because in Sunnydale there are no black people, well not among the good guys anyway. However you will find all the vampires (certainly once they kick off) become somewhat darkish and ethnic in appearance (Obviously not Angel and Spike, but of course they are realy good guys at heart). Maybe you can seek and find one or two exceptions to this, but I don't think you can deny the drift of my theme here, and that by implication the serie/s suggests that all crime in America is driven by ethnic origin, and that what White (Supremist) America is crying out for is a chosen one, to lead some sort of ethnic cleansing drive. I can see you now choking on your cornflakes, thinking I am completely over the top in my analysis, but sadly I don't think so at all, and is the main reason why I could not sit through any repeats of a once favourite series.


I actually wanted to make a couple of comments about Spank's original piece, and I will do so in a minute, but I have to respond to a couple of outrageous comments from Suze - who is, of course, entitled to his opinion, just as I am entitled to point out a few things.

I know that the changes in Willow's character over time annoyed a lot of the fans, not just Suze. But, whether you like the directions she was taken in or not, the fact is that a lot of it was foreshadowed in many earlier episodes: most obviously the Lesbianism in Doppleganger Land, but Willow's early fascination with magic right from Witch in Season One, where we first meet Amy, and other points in-between. Dislike the changes all you want, but they cannot legitimately be described as hurried, shoe-horned or not thought through, and anyone who does re-watch the episodes will find a wealth of material supporting not only Willow's character changes but others, too. The show is all about the characters and their growth and development. Everyone changes.

Quick easy to pick up one, which is to do with where Faith comes in, and how it really does show how little attention Suze paid. To anyone who has never seen the show, and wants to use this 10th Anniversary of the first airing in the US as an excuse to start, there will be Spoilers to follow, so look away until the next paragraph. But the fact is that Buffy died - briefly - in the last episode of Season One. This activates the next slayer - a Jamaican named Kendra, who Suze has either missed through inattention or decided not worthy of mention. Anyway, after Kendra dies, that activates Faith. Simple, really.

Finally, I don't want to get into this last in a big way, but I do have to address the accusation of racism. Joss's work has on a few occasions picked up criticisms for the lack of non-white characters, and in a small way, simply on invisibility grounds, there may be a case to answer. But the accusation that there is an actual racist theme in it is nonsense and offensive. I'm not going to list counter examples, as that's getting into a tit-for-tat game that I'm just not interested in playing. The show isn't commenting in any way on crime and its origins, and even if it were, the conclusion leapt to here would be very strange. Joss's writing and work is empowering and positive, and anyone who watched Buffy through to the end of Season Seven will see how totally absurd Suze's comments about the Chosen One are.


What I really wanted to talk about was a couple of things Spank said, and my own reactions to this marathon.

The unaired pilot was, as far as I know, a kind-of sales pitch, never intended to be aired. The effects were not fully finished, and it was not full length. I know I have heard Joss himself say how he didn't really know how to direct at that time, and I don't think he would ever have intended it to be seen widely (oh, the dubious joys of the Internet). I'm glad I have seen it, merely as a curiosity piece, though.

Far from killing Spank over this, I would agree Season One isn't perfect: until I've rewatched them, I can't be sure whether any of the seasons were, but I always remembered that Season One was new and feeling its way. It is still terrific for a first season of a show, though, and it actually stood up better than I thought it might. All my favourite episodes from the season stand up to my memory of them, and there are others I'd not remembered so well which exceed it.

I think it really was the season finale, Prophecy Girl, which stood out. It was Joss's real directorial debut, and I knew that. But it also was one of the few he wrote by himself (althugh any interview with any Buffy writer gives the distinct impression he had a hand in all of them - I wonder if that was the case right from Season One?), and it was the first one which affected me the way so much of Joss's work has subsequently. Even though I've seen it a few times before, and so knew what was going to happen, it still brought up tears into my eyes. No-one can play with the emotions the way Joss does, and it is for that that I will always love his work.

And I am definitely planning on re-watching all ofthe rest of the show, although whether by the end of this year or not remains to be seen. If I have to content myself with picking one or two from each season, to get myself through to the end of the year, then I still know that will be worth doing. But rewatching the whole of Season One has whet my appetite.

Joss's continutation of the story, in comic-book form, starts next week, and I am looking forward to that enormously, too. Although I would still prefer more Jossy goodness on the TV screen.

Thank You, Joss (in case you're looking...).

Suze (accept no imposters)

Wow we have got a debate going in Spank The Monkey, things are looking up.

Okay I will respond to some of BBG's points and agree to differ on others, especially based on the fact I have only ever seen the episodes once.

1) Yes I bow to your more in depth knowledge on how Faith came about (on that I was actually asking a question not making a statement). However I still think a series based upon there being a once in a generation, chosen one slayer, should not then have a second slayer thrown into the mix, just because it was explained in a single episode (it confuses simple types like me). Again this is a question (as my memory fails me) when Buffy died again at the end of series six (or five), was there yet another slayer created ?

2) I have to stand by my Willow comments here. Firstly she had a relationship with werewolf boy (can't remember his name), and then there was also this unspoken platonic thing with Xander that went over several series. Yet then zap all of a sudden she is a lesbian and shacked up. Kind of strikes me that this either: came about after some sort of viewer poll asking people what would they want to see next, or perhaps they suddenly realised they had a large gay fanbase and wanted to be more inclusive.

Worse than that however was the whole witchcraft overdevelpment. Yes her interests in that was in there almost from the start. However are the writers really suggesting that over the course of a few school years, with limited access to a few books and the internet (after all she wasn't anyones apprentice), she suddenly had the power to stand toe to toe with the god of all gods Gloria. Hmmm. And how did she end up ? Turning into some sort of supernova ? (crikey I better stick to my lingerie websites)

3) Moving on to the crime theme, and the hostile environment many kids of student age in America exist in, sure that is probably my analogy and interpretation, which I think is as good as any. Someone else may see the whole series, as a warning of the mischief teenagers can get into without proper parental supervision (who knows, don't accept the ones the makers give you, as your own ones are always more fun).

4) You can' deny however the Aaron Spelling comparisons here. There is not a lack of non-white characters here, there isn't any at all (Kendra very briefly excepted then). Kind of strange in a country where Spanish is the first language of the majority of the population and where non white (if you lump all minorities together) are greater in number than white people. Perhaps Sunnydale is really some sort of gated community. Yet goddmmit someone let them ethnics in: as I said, the vampires (look again) all tend to take on a rather darkish hue, once they are looking to bite someone. I haven't got any doubts where the makers stand on the issue of race (and by implication crime), even if they don't want the series interpreted as an analogy for present day America.

To summarise, for me Buffy was an enjoyable serie/s for once only viewing, but unless you are a Trekkie type (is a buffie the correct name for that) for me anyway, it doesn't stand up to a repeated viewing.


Last reply here - not going to get into a lengthy debate.

To answer about after the second time she died, the baton had already been passed, so to speak, so no third Slayer gets made.

And just to add: the person who hasn't seen it more than once says it doesn't stand up to a repeated viewing; the people who have say it definitely does. Take from that what you will.

And that's all I'm going to say on the subject.


Suze, your posts have so many holes in it you could be a writer for "Prison Break." To point out just two:

"There is not a lack of non-white characters here, there isn't any at all (Kendra very briefly excepted then)."

And what would that make that fellow who's part of the Initiative (who now plays D.L. on "Heroes"), or Principal Wood in the last season?

"Yet then zap all of a sudden she is a lesbian and shacked up. Kind of strikes me that this either: came about after some sort of viewer poll asking people what would they want to see next, or perhaps they suddenly realised they had a large gay fanbase and wanted to be more inclusive."

All of a sudden? Given that there were indications that there was more to Willow's personality than meets the eye before she came out (like when Buffy assured Willow that the vampire part of her wasn't really a reflection of herself and Angel started to say something...), it's hardly all of a sudden. And if they did want to pander to their "large gay fanbase," they wouldn't have risked pissing them off by killing off Tara (and get accused of being homophobic in the process by people who conveniently overlooked the vast amount of HETERO relationships that end unhappily on the show).

Still, what would you expect from anyone who would actually consider "Star Trek: Voyager" to be one of the great US TV shows of the past decade, regardless of rewatchability?

Suze (accept no imposters)

QUOTE And what would that make that fellow who's part of the Initiative (who now plays D.L. on "Heroes"), or Principal Wood in the last season?

Answer - Is that it then ?

QUOTE Still, what would you expect from anyone who would actually consider "Star Trek: Voyager" to be one of the great US TV shows of the past decade

Answer - Well considering the rubbish competition from the rest of US TV like I dunno: LOST, SOPRANOS, CSI, and that one about the White House, then of course VOYAGER comes across as Shakespeare. If your still reading ha ha, actually I meant Trek Next Generation as one of the great shows (I included Voyager in brackets really as a footnote, to ilustrate it was better than DS9 or Enterprize).

Suze (accept no imposters)

QUOTE - To answer about after the second time she died, the baton had already been passed, so to speak, so no third Slayer gets made.

Answer - Who to then, and why haven't they got a series ?

QUOTE -And just to add: the person who hasn't seen it more than once says it doesn't stand up to a repeated viewing; the people who have say it definitely does.

Answer - Don't quite get your logic here. If I understand this correctly you're saying, you actually have to see something a second time, in order to know you dont want to see it a second time. Huh ?


Just to pick up on something The BBG mentioned in passing: Joss Whedon is currently masterminding a comic book series that will pick up the story of Buffy from after the end of the seventh and final season of the show. In fact, he's going so far as to call the comic Buffy Season 8. The first issue comes out in the US this Wednesday, March 14th, and in the UK the day after. More details here:

I wonder how many black people it'll have in it? (runs away)


There you go, there's one on page six.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)